ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Liver enhancement using rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT with reduced iodine contrast dose compared with single-energy CT with standard iodine dose: an intra-patient comparison.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare liver parenchymal enhancement and tumor washout on portal and delayed phases between rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT (DECT) with a low-iodine-dose (LID) contrast medium protocol (350 mg/kg) and conventional single-energy CT (SECT) with a standard-iodine-dose protocol (525 mg/kg), in patients referred for primary liver cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll consecutive patients referred for primary liver cancer assessment who underwent both SECT with standard iodine dose and DECT with LID protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Relative Liver Enhancement (RLE) and parenchymal contrast-to-noise ratio (pCNR) on portal venous (PVP) and delayed phases were compared between 50 keV virtual monochromatic DECT and SECT images. A sub-analysis at 77 keV was also performed. Quantitative tumor enhancement (QTE) and tumoral contrast-to-noise ratio (tCNR) were compared between techniques in a subset of patients bearing LI-RADS 5 liver tumors.
resultsSeventy-seven patients (mean age 66±9 years) were included and 154 CT scans were analyzed (February 2023-October 2023). RLE and pCNR were significantly higher on 50-keV DECT than on SECT during both PVP (RLE: 1.68 ± 0.45 vs. 0.82 ± 0.18; pCNR: 2.90 ± 1.01 vs. 2.54 ± 0.76; all p < 0.01) and delayed phases (RLE: 1.17 ± 0.41 vs. 0.61 ± 0.19; pCNR: 1.84 ± 0.90 vs. 1.61 ± 0.67; p < 0.05). At 77 keV, RLE and pCNR were similar to SECT. Among thirty-one LR-5 tumors (n = 17 patients), QTE and tCNR were significantly greater on 50-keV DECT than SECT across all phases including PVP (-29.48 ± 16.4 vs. -13.38 ± 11.98 p < 0.001) and delayed phase (-23.48 ± 13.43 vs. -8.14 ± 10.49 p < 0.001).
conclusionRapid kVp-switching DECT at 50-keV DECT VMIs improves liver and tumor contrast on PVP and delayed phase despite a 33% iodine dose reduction, supporting its use in cirrhotic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40673938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.