ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2025
Provider Perspectives on the Data-to-Suppression Initiative in Ryan White Part A Housing and Behavioral Health Programs.
Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The New York City "Data-to-Suppression" (D2S) initiative was launched to improve HIV viral suppression among Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A (RWPA) clients through a combination of surveillance-based, client-level reporting and capacity-building activities with RWPA housing and behavioral health service providers. This study qualitatively examines provider perspectives on its implementation. Drawing from 8 RWPA-funded agencies participating in D2S, we conducted semistructured interviews with 24 purposively sampled providers from 8 RWPA-funded agencies participating in D2S, including patient navigators engaged in D2S outreach, patient navigator supervisors, and administrators. Interviews were conducted between August and November 2022. The interviews explored four topics: (1) D2S workflow and benefits, (2) implementation facilitators, (3) implementation barriers, and (4) areas for improvement. Providers reported that D2S was easy to implement and identified clients in need of additional support. Suggestions for improvement included issuing more timely reports, adding more detailed data to reports, and focusing the intervention on agencies where behavioral health and housing program staff do not already have access to clients' HIV care and viral suppression status. Providers described barriers such as organizational capacity constraints (e.g., hiring and retaining staffing levels) and clients' difficulty with maintaining viral suppression due to competing needs. Qualitative feedback from the providers responsible for delivering an intervention is critical to identifying refinements that could strengthen engagement in intervention implementation and thus critical to achieving and sustaining the intended impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.