ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025
Externally validated population pharmacokinetics of amikacin and evaluation of dosage regimen based on achieved serum concentrations in neonates.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Non-Neonatal Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combination antibiotics consisting of beta-lactam and aminoglycoside are commonly utilized in the treatment of neonatal septicaemia. The aims of this study were to (i) develop an externally validated population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, (ii) evaluate the attainment of target peak and trough serum concentrations by the current hospital amikacin dosing protocol and side effects, and (iii) compare intravenous (IV) versus intramuscular (IM) route of amikacin administration, in terms of attaining peak and trough serum concentration targets. Retrospective chart review was carried out over a 5-year period. All neonates who received amikacin with therapeutic drug monitoring performed were included in this study. A one-compartment population PK model was built, and external validation was performed. A total of 181 neonates (534 serum concentrations) were included in the population PK modeling and external validation. There was no apparent systematic bias in the predictions of the model. The external validation performed in the current study found the model to be generally unbiased. Sixty-one percent of the peak and 99% of the trough levels were within the targeted therapeutic ranges of 15-25 and <5 mg/L, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of trough concentrations that were within therapeutic range for IV as compared to IM, while IM resulted in a higher proportion of trough concentrations within therapeutic range, as well as higher peak concentrations. The current population PK model and external validation study have proven that the PK model built in the current study can be used to conduct reliable population simulations. IM injection can be an alternative route of administration for amikacin in neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.