ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Immunogenicity of monovalent and multivalent subunit vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants in mice with divergent vaccination history.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are challenges in selecting SARS-CoV-2 vaccine compositions, primarily due to divergent infection or vaccination history and immunological biases toward previous strains. In this study, we evaluated humoral immune responses induced by variant-based monovalent vaccines as booster shots in mice previously vaccinated with an ancestral strain-based vaccine with or without Omicron BA.5 exposure. Our data suggest that immunological biases toward earlier variants attenuated the potency of variant-based vaccines as a booster dose against subsequent variants, whereas a second booster dose mitigated this effect. Furthermore, in the context of vaccine-induced immunity, prior exposure to Omicron sublineages (e.g., BA.5) attenuated the effect of immunological biases toward earlier variants on the neutralizing potency against Omicron subvariants. In addition, the interval between vaccine doses should also be considered, as an immunologic plateau might occur after repeated vaccination. Furthermore, the XBB.1 monovalent vaccine and a tetravalent vaccine (SCTV01E-2) composed of pre-Omicron variant (Beta) and Omicron subvariants (BA.1, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1) showed comparable neutralizing potency against several Omicron sublineages (BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, XBB.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and EG.5) under divergent vaccination history, implicating that multivalent platforms could be explored as a flexible strategy if future strains diverge significantly from current variants.IMPORTANCEContinuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants has raised the need to optimize immunization regimens and update vaccine compositions to protect against the newly emerging variants in the context of repeated vaccination. The significance of this research is briefly summarized as follows:1) Immunological biases toward earlier variants attenuated the potency of variant-based vaccines as a booster dose against subsequent variants, which can be mitigated by a second booster dose.2) In the context of vaccine-induced immunity, a previous exposure to Omicron sublineages, such as BA.5, attenuated the influence of immunological biases toward earlier variants on the neutralizing potency against Omicron subvariants.3) The interval between vaccine doses should be taken into account since an immunologic plateau might occur after repeated vaccination.4) Multivalent vaccines, with epitope diversity, may theoretically enhance the magnitude and breadth of cross-neutralization responses, thereby providing a buffer for unpredictable future variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.