ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025
Elevated levels of mental health issues among optometrists in the United Kingdom.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working Conditions of Employee Optometrists in Australia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Elevated levels of mental health issues among optometrists in the United Kingdom.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the mental health and well-being of optometrists in the UK and explore associated factors.
methodA cross-sectional online survey of UK-based optometrists was conducted over a 3-month period during 2024. The survey included validated, well-established measures to assess psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2) and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-2). Well-being was evaluated in relation to optimal healthy living behaviours.
resultsThe study includes results from 1303 qualified optometrists, of whom 37% had moderate-to-severe psychological distress scores, 24% screened positive for depression and 28% for anxiety. The three strongest predictors of higher psychological distress in a regression analysis were younger age, lower self-reported physical health and the absence of additional roles. For both depression and anxiety, the significant predictors were younger age, poorer self-reported physical health and not being an Independent Prescriber. Across all three mental health measures, female optometrists exhibited poorer scores than male optometrists. Adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviours was associated with better mental health outcomes. However, neither gender nor adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviours was identified as independent predictors and was therefore not retained in the final logistic regression model.
conclusionHigher prevalence of mental health conditions was observed among UK-based optometrists than in the general population. Optometrists with higher qualifications and those undertaking additional roles may experience improved mental well-being, although further research is needed. The findings emphasise the need for initiatives to support mental well-being, particularly among young optometrists and those early in their optometry career.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.