ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Computed cardiopulmonography: Effects of physical characteristics on lung parameter estimates.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The search for the ultra-elusive: Can computed cardiopulmonography enhance early detection of gas exchange abnormality?Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Computed cardiopulmonography: Effects of physical characteristics on lung parameter estimates.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed cardiopulmonography (CCP) is a technique that measures lung volumes (functional residual capacity and deadspace) together with novel parameters reflecting lung inhomogeneities (non-uniformities in lung inflation and deadspace path length). First, highly precise measurements of gas exchange are made during a nitrogen washout with a purpose-built molecular flow sensor. Second, an individual's lung physiology is then described by personalising the parameters of a bespoke cardio-respiratory model obtained by fitting the model to the data. The present study examines the effects of participants' physical characteristics on these parameter values, and from this also provides preliminary estimates for normal ranges. Data from 92 healthy individuals (27% female, age 40 ± 19 (mean ± SD) years, height 1.75 ± 0.09 m, mass 74 ± 14 kg) were used. A prediction equation for each CCP parameter was written as: y = α + βln(age) + γln(height) + δln(BMI) + ε(is_Female) + error, where BMI is body mass index. Non-significant terms (P > 0.1) were removed sequentially to identify just the significant characteristics. Physical characteristics exerted a large influence on volume-related CCP parameters. In contrast, only age had a significant influence on inhomogeneity-related CCP parameters. The prediction equations, together with their mean squared errors, were used to calculate z-scores for CCP data from three previously published studies in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and early cystic fibrosis. Values for these z-scores often lay beyond those commonly used to define a normal range (±1.65). In conclusion, reference values for inhomogeneity-based CCP parameters may only need correcting for age, and often appear as abnormal in airways disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.