Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673575›Full record

ArticleJournal of paediatrics and child health2025

The Use of a Ward Round Teaching Tool in a Paediatric Oncology Department.

Trisha A Soosay Raj, Natacha Omer, Amy Z Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trisha A Soosay RajDepartment of Oncology, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-0402
Natacha OmerDepartment of Oncology, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5643-1307
Amy Z GrayUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0127-0769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDespite ward rounds being fundamental to hospital-based clinical training, the reported educational value is low. Especially in busy environments, missed learning opportunities occur due to implicit learning, time barriers, and lack of ward round structure. The STIC framework (Set, Target, Inspect, Close) provides a learner-centred, structured approach to ward round teaching, aimed to enhance education within limited timeframes. We aimed to investigate how the introduction of the STIC framework impacts on learner-centred teaching within a tertiary Paediatric Oncology department.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate framework implementation, with two participant groups comprising 16 junior and senior doctors over 3 months. Surveys were used to document junior staff experience on rounds pre- and post-implementation, with focus groups and interviews used for all participants to explore satisfaction and attitudes to the tool.

resultsLearner satisfaction improved across all domains of the framework, specifically opportunities for leading clinical encounters and learning on consultant-led rounds. Despite consultants reporting lack of uptake, trainees reported improved teaching. Consultant beliefs and enthusiasm had a strong impact on trainee satisfaction. Trainees placed a high value on active participation and autonomy for their learning. Factors distinct to teaching were reported to affect learner satisfaction, such as planning, time management, and departmental culture.

conclusionsWe demonstrate enhanced teaching despite poor perceived uptake, demonstrating the potential of the STIC framework with further implementation. Our study also highlights that in addition to a specific teaching focus, consultant engagement and a safe clinical learning environment are crucial for learning.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyOncology Service, HospitalPediatricsTeaching RoundsAttitude of Health PersonnelFocus GroupsHumansSurveys and Questionnairesclinical learning environmenteducationframeworklearnerWard rounds

Identifiers

PMID40673575
PMCPMC12515269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.