ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Sex Differences in Stroke Care and Outcomes: A National Stroke Registry Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-Based Efficacy of Endovascular Thrombectomy Techniques in LVO Stroke: A Multicenter Registry Analysis.Stroke · 2026Article
- Sex-based differences in emergency department treatment times for acute ischaemic stroke: evidence from a large Italian cohort.European stroke journal · 2026Observational
- Sex differences in location of initial diagnosis and discharge destination among medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with post-stroke aphasia.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Patient Reported Outcome Measures after Stroke: What's New and What's Next?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Global Burden of Diet High in Processed Meat-related Stroke, 1990-2021.Current neurovascular research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious evidence on sex differences in stroke care and outcomes was limited in sample representativeness and coverage of care indicators. We aim to investigate various indicators of stroke care quality, survival, and functional outcome at discharge between men and women, using a national stroke registry.
methodsTen key indicators, representative from across stroke care pathway, were compared between men and women using the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, a national quality register for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (2013-2023, n=844 970). Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust variance were constructed to estimated adjusted relative risks (ARR). The 1-year adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) of mortality were conducted using adjusted restricted mean survival time. Favorable functional outcomes at discharge were measured using modified Rankin Scale (0-2).
resultsWomen comprised 48% of the study population, mean age 77 years (SD: 13.4) compared with 72 years (13.3) for men. Compared with men, women tend to have severe strokes (19% versus 12%), lower prevalence of diabetes (20% versus 24%), and higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (21% versus 18%) but similar stroke types (ischemic: 87% versus 88%). Women were less likely to have thrombolysis of arrival <1 hour, brain scan <1 hour, thrombolysis of stroke onset <4 hours, swallowing screen <4 hours, admission to stroke unit <4 hours, assessed by trained nurses <24 hours, assessed by occupational therapist <72 hours, and communication speech and language therapy <72 hours. Women tended to have poorer functional outcome at discharge (ARR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.06]) but better 1-year survival (AHR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99]).
conclusionsWomen were less likely to receive several indicators of evidence-based stroke care compared with men. Although they had better survival, functional outcome was poorer in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.