Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673451›Full record

Observational studyPsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025

Flunitrazepam increases the risk of lamotrigine-induced cutaneous adverse reactions: Combined analysis of medical big data and clinical research.

Hiroshi Bando, Mitsuhiro Goda, Masahito Nakataki, Keita Hirai, Yuki Nitta, Kei Kawada, Toshihiko Yoshioka, Masaya Kanda, Atsushi Ogawa, Chiaki Mukuta-Murakami and 12 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Hiroshi BandoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1847-3754
Mitsuhiro GodaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Masahito NakatakiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-6991
Keita HiraiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-3508
Yuki NittaDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Kei KawadaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Toshihiko YoshiokaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Masaya KandaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Atsushi OgawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Chiaki Mukuta-MurakamiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Kaito TsujinakaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Koji MiyataDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Kohei KitagawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-3083
Takahiro NiimuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Fuka AizawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Kenta YagiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Yuki Izawa-IshizawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Masayuki ChumaDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Takafumi NaitoDepartment of Pharmacy, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.
Yoshikazu TasakiDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Shusuke NumataDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Keisuke IshizawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H01015Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H04302Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H05286Research Foundation for Pharmaceutical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe concomitant use of lamotrigine and valproic acid, a uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase inhibitor, is a known risk factor for lamotrigine-induced rashes, which may develop into fatal or severe cutaneous adverse reactions. No drugs other than valproic acid have been shown to increase lamotrigine concentrations in humans by inhibiting UDP-glucuronosyltransferase. The treatment of bipolar disorder and epilepsy is often combined with other medications, which may affect the risk of rash. We aimed to identify medications that increased the risk of lamotrigine-induced rashes using clinical data.

methodsWe used VigiBase to search for drugs associated with the increased number of reported severe cutaneous adverse reactions when combined with lamotrigine. In a retrospective study, we collected information on patients from electronic medical records and used propensity score matching to compare the incidence of lamotrigine-induced rash with and without flunitrazepam use. Furthermore, we compared lamotrigine concentrations between patients treated with and without flunitrazepam in a prospective observational study.

resultsVigiBase analysis showed that flunitrazepam significantly increased the reporting odds ratio for lamotrigine-related severe cutaneous adverse reactions. In the retrospective study, combining lamotrigine with flunitrazepam significantly increased the incidence of rashes. In the prospective observational study, lamotrigine with flunitrazepam significantly increased the concentration-to-dose ratio.

conclusionFlunitrazepam use may affect lamotrigine concentration and increase the risk of rash. These results have implications for the choice of sleep medication. In addition, when lamotrigine is used in combination with flunitrazepam, the lamotrigine dosing design should address lamotrigine-induced rash management.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsDrug EruptionsExanthemaLamotrigineAdultAgedBipolar DisorderDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineflunitrazepamlamotriginemedical big datarashUDP‐glucuronosyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID40673451
PMCPMC12498123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.