Potential for error when relying on administrative data.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Divergent associations between adiposity and hernia subtypes in European populations: A Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Electronic health records research: easy evidence, harder oversight.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026
   Article
3. Estrogen Exposure is Associated With Reduced Otosclerosis Risk in Obesity and Hormone Therapy.Otology & neurotology open · 2026
   Article
4. Real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following a transition to aripiprazole once every 2 months among patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder in the United States.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.