ArticleInsect molecular biology2026
SYNCAS-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in the Jewel wasp, Nasonia vitripennis.
Article in Insect molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A genome sequence and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tools for the solanaceous specialist pest Tetranychus evansi.Insect biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Dynamic proteomics of Nasonia vitripennis pupal development reveals testis-specific regulation of new proteins (orphans) likely related to exo-α-sialidases.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Integrated Pest Management Strategies for ControllingInsects · 2026Review
- SYNCAS-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in the Jewel wasp, Nasonia vitripennis.Insect molecular biology · 2026Article
- Why just fly?Fly · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic engineering is a formidable approach to studying biology. The development of CRISPR-Cas9 has allowed the genetic engineering of insect species from several orders, and in some species, this tool is used routinely for genetic research. However, insect gene editing often relies on the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 components via embryo injection. This technique has a limitation: some species lay their eggs inside hard substrates or living hosts, making embryo collection impossible or labour intensive. Recently, a variety of techniques that exploit maternal injection of nucleases have been developed to circumvent embryo injection. Yet, despite this variety of maternal delivery techniques, some insects remain refractory to gene editing. One of these is the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis, an important hymenopteran model species. In this study, a recently developed method termed SYNCAS was used to perform knock-out (KO) of the cinnabar gene in this wasp, obtaining KO efficiencies up to 10 times higher than reported for other maternal injection approaches. We found up to 2.73% of all offspring to display a KO phenotype, and we obtained up to 68 KO offspring per 100 injected mothers. The optimal timing of injection and provision of hosts for egg laying was determined. With this protocol, routine applications of CRISPR-Cas9 become feasible in this species, allowing reverse genetics studies of genes with unknown associated phenotypes and paving the way for more advanced editing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.