Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673390›Full record

ArticleInsect molecular biology2026

SYNCAS-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in the Jewel wasp, Nasonia vitripennis.

Filippo Guerra, Sander De Rouck, Eveline C Verhulst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Why just fly?Fly · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippo GuerraLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-958X
Sander De RouckLaboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6322-1121
Eveline C VerhulstLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) OCENW.M.22.140European Research Council 101123162Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) G035420N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic engineering is a formidable approach to studying biology. The development of CRISPR-Cas9 has allowed the genetic engineering of insect species from several orders, and in some species, this tool is used routinely for genetic research. However, insect gene editing often relies on the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 components via embryo injection. This technique has a limitation: some species lay their eggs inside hard substrates or living hosts, making embryo collection impossible or labour intensive. Recently, a variety of techniques that exploit maternal injection of nucleases have been developed to circumvent embryo injection. Yet, despite this variety of maternal delivery techniques, some insects remain refractory to gene editing. One of these is the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis, an important hymenopteran model species. In this study, a recently developed method termed SYNCAS was used to perform knock-out (KO) of the cinnabar gene in this wasp, obtaining KO efficiencies up to 10 times higher than reported for other maternal injection approaches. We found up to 2.73% of all offspring to display a KO phenotype, and we obtained up to 68 KO offspring per 100 injected mothers. The optimal timing of injection and provision of hosts for egg laying was determined. With this protocol, routine applications of CRISPR-Cas9 become feasible in this species, allowing reverse genetics studies of genes with unknown associated phenotypes and paving the way for more advanced editing techniques.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingWaspsAnimalsFemaleGene Knockout TechniquesInsect ProteinsInsect ProteinsBAPCgene editingNasonia vitripennissaponinSYNCAS

Identifiers

PMID40673390
PMCPMC12779185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.