ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Graph Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Frontier Molecular Orbital Prediction: A Case Study with Neurotransmitters and Antidepressants.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable QSAR models of 5-HT1A receptor ligands using conceptual DFT descriptors and no-code machine learning tools.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advancement of artificial intelligence-embedded methodologies, their application to predict fundamental molecular properties has become increasingly prevalent. In this study, a graph convolutional neural network fingerprint-enabled artificial neural network (GCN-ANN) was utilized to probe the relationship between the chemical hardness of neurochemicals and their affinities for neuroreceptors. The GCN-ANN model was derived using a training set of B3LYP-calculated HOMO and LUMO energies of >110,000 molecules. A benchmark study of 45 neurochemicals produced consistent hardness and electronegativity values across the three density functionals, namely, B3LYP, ωB97XD, and M06-2X. However, the computed energetics varied significantly when the Hartree-Fock theory was used. The scrutiny of binding affinities, hardness, and GCN-ANN-derived substructures of neurochemicals reinforces the notion that human brain receptors interact with neurochemicals based on Pearson's Hard-Soft Acid-Base (HSAB) principle. In summary, this machine-learning-embedded study offers physical insights into the interactions between neurochemicals and neuroreceptors, which could lead to the development of more targeted and effective antidepressants, thereby addressing anxiety and depression with greater precision and immediacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.