Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673352›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Integrating Microbial Community Data Into an Ecosystem-Scale Model to Predict Litter Decomposition in the Face of Climate Change.

Katherine S Rocci, Derek Pierson, Fiona V Jevon, Alexander Polussa, Angela M Oliverio, Mark A Bradford, Peter B Reich, William R Wieder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine S RocciInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-6833
Derek PiersonRocky Mountain Research Station, United States Forest Service, Boise, Idaho, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3413-1693
Fiona V JevonThe Forest School, Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Alexander PolussaThe Forest School, Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Angela M OliverioBiology Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Mark A BradfordThe Forest School, Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Peter B ReichInstitute for Global Change Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
William R WiederInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7116-1985

Funding

Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute 508878Division of Environmental Biology DEB-1926413Division of Environmental Biology DEB-1926482National Science Foundation Biological Integration Institute NSF-DBI-2021898National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship DBI 2109592University of Michigan Biosciences Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Litter decomposition is an important ecosystem process and global carbon flux that has been shown to be controlled by climate, litter quality, and microbial communities. Process-based ecosystem models are used to predict responses of litter decomposition to climate change. While these models represent climate and litter quality effects on litter decomposition, they have yet to integrate empirical microbial community data into their parameterizations for predicting litter decomposition. To fill this gap, our research used a comprehensive leaf litterbag decomposition experiment at 10 temperate forest U.S. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) sites to calibrate (7 sites) and validate (3 sites) the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model. MIMICS was calibrated to empirical decomposition rates and to their empirical drivers, including the microbial community (represented as the copiotroph-to-oligotroph ratio). We calibrate to empirical drivers, rather than solely rates or pool sizes, to improve the underlying drivers of modeled leaf litter decomposition. We then validated the calibrated model and evaluated the effects of calibration under climate change using the SSP 3-7.0 climate change scenario. We find that incorporating empirical drivers of litter decomposition provides similar, and sometimes better (in terms of goodness-of-fit metrics), predictions of leaf litter decomposition but with different underlying ecological dynamics. For some sites, calibration also increased climate change-induced leaf litter mass loss by up to 5%, with implications for carbon cycle-climate feedbacks. Our work also provides an example for integrating data on the relative abundance of bacterial functional groups into an ecosystem model using a novel calibration method to bridge empiricism and process-based modeling, answering a call for the use of empirical microbial community data in process-based ecosystem models. We highlight that incorporating mechanistic information into models, as done in this study, is important for improving confidence in model projections of ecological processes like litter decomposition under climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemMicrobiotaModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalPlant LeavesForestsSoil Microbiologyclimate change impactsdata‐model integrationecosystem‐scale modellitterbagslitter decompositionmicrobial traitsmodel calibrationsoil microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID40673352
PMCPMC12268835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.