Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

An exploratory study of the relevance of therapy format and therapist' training in individual cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis.

Oda Skancke Gjerdalen, Manuela Zucknick, Ingvild Tvedt Westlie, Helen Bull, Stig Evensen, Erik Falkum, Marit Grande, Roger Hagen, Kristin Lie Romm, Lene Hunnicke Jensen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Oda Skancke GjerdalenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Manuela ZucknickOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingvild Tvedt WestlieDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Helen BullFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Stig EvensenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Erik FalkumInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marit GrandeDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Roger HagenDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristin Lie RommDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lene Hunnicke JensenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Petter Andreas RingenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Olivia Schjøtt-PedersenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Nasrettin SönmezDepartment of Adult psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Torill UelandDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tiril ØstefjellsDepartment for Specialised Inpatient Treatment, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jan Ivar RøssbergDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
June Ullevoldsæter LystadDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is an evidence-based intervention that can be delivered in various formats, including as part of vocational rehabilitation. However, due to scarcity of resources, CBTp is currently accessible to only a minority of individuals with psychosis. This secondary analysis aims to explore potential differences in clinical outcomes between distinct CBTp formats and to examine whether therapist training influences treatment effect. Exploring these aspects is of importance, as they may influence the scalability and accessibility of CBTp in routine care. Material and methods: Data in this study is sourced from two independent projects; Results: In line with expectations, all groups demonstrated overall improvements in functioning and symptom levels. After adjusting for relevant confounders, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups receiving CBTp following treatment initiation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that CBTp may be effective across different delivery formats and levels of therapist training in terms of similar, positive clinical outcomes for this patient group. This has potential implications for service design and broader implementation of CBTp in real-world settings.

Indexed as

cognitive behavioral therapypsychosistherapist trainingtherapy formatvocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40673229
PMCPMC12263635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.