ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Dynamic taxonomy generation for future skills identification using a named entity recognition and relation extraction pipeline.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The labor market is rapidly evolving, leading to a mismatch between existing Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) and future occupational requirements. Reports from organizations like the World Economic Forum and the OECD emphasize the need for dynamic skill identification. This paper introduces a novel system for constructing a dynamic taxonomy using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, specifically Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Extraction (RE), to identify and predict future skills. By leveraging machine learning models, this taxonomy aims to bridge the gap between current skills and future demands, contributing to educational and professional development. Methods: To achieve this, an NLP-based architecture was developed using a combination of text preprocessing, NER, and RE models. The NER model identifies and categorizes KSAs and occupations from a corpus of labor market reports, while the RE model establishes the relationships between these entities. A custom pipeline was used for PDF text extraction, tokenization, and lemmatization to standardize the data. The models were trained and evaluated using over 1,700 annotated documents, with the training process optimized for both entity recognition and relationship prediction accuracy. Results: The NER and RE models demonstrated promising performance. The NER model achieved a best micro-averaged F1-score of 65.38% in identifying occupations, skills, and knowledge entities. The RE model subsequently achieved a best micro-F1 score of 82.2% for accurately classifying semantic relationships between these entities at epoch 1,009. The taxonomy generated from these models effectively identified emerging skills and occupations, offering insights into future workforce requirements. Visualizations of the taxonomy were created using various graph structures, demonstrating its applicability across multiple sectors. The results indicate that this system can dynamically update and adapt to changes in skill demand over time. Discussion: The dynamic taxonomy model not only provides real-time updates on current competencies but also predicts emerging skill trends, offering a valuable tool for workforce planning. The high recall rates in NER suggest strong entity recognition capabilities, though precision improvements are needed to reduce false positives. Limitations include the need for a larger corpus and sector-specific models. Future work will focus on expanding the corpus, improving model accuracy, and incorporating expert feedback to further refine the taxonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.