Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673211›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

AI in humanitarian healthcare: a game changer for crisis response.

Diala Haykal, Mohamad Goldust, Hugues Cartier, Patrick Treacy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diala HaykalCentre Laser Palaiseau, Palaiseau, France.
Mohamad GoldustDepartment of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Hugues CartierCentre Médical Saint Jean, Arras, France.
Patrick TreacyAilesbury Clinics Ltd., Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming humanitarian healthcare by providing innovative solutions to critical challenges in crisis response. This review explores peer-reviewed literature and case reports from 2001 to 2025, retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, using targeted keywords. Results indicate that AI enhances disaster prediction, disease surveillance, resource allocation, and mental health support through tools such as machine learning, natural language processing, robotics, and blockchain. Prominent applications include AI-powered early warning systems, chatbots for displaced populations, telemedicine platforms, and automated supply chain logistics. Ethical concerns such as data privacy, bias, and access inequities remain critical to responsible deployment. By uniting governments, NGOs, and technology providers, AI serves as a powerful tool to strengthen humanitarian healthcare systems, enhancing resilience and efficiency while ensuring better outcomes for vulnerable populations during crises.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecrisis responsedisaster managementethical considerationshumanitarian healthcare

Identifiers

PMID40673211
PMCPMC12263676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.