Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673165›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Developing and testing AI-based voice biomarker models to detect cognitive impairment among community dwelling adults: a cross-sectional study in Japan.

Eri Kiyoshige, Soshiro Ogata, Namhee Kwon, Yuriko Nakaoku, Chisato Hayashi, Nate Blaylock, Raymond Brueckner, Vinod Subramanian, Henry Joseph OConnell, Yusuke Yoshikawa and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical validation of a voice-based AI tool for screening cognitive impairment: a prospective multicenter study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eri KiyoshigeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Soshiro OgataDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Namhee KwonCanary Speech, Inc., 1800 Novell Place, Suite H51, Provo, UT, 84606, USA.
Yuriko NakaokuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Chisato HayashiResearch Institute of Nursing Care for People and Community, University of Hyogo, 13-71, Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-8588, Japan.
Nate BlaylockCanary Speech, Inc., 1800 Novell Place, Suite H51, Provo, UT, 84606, USA.
Raymond BruecknerCanary Speech, Inc., 1800 Novell Place, Suite H51, Provo, UT, 84606, USA.
Vinod SubramanianCanary Speech, Inc., 1800 Novell Place, Suite H51, Provo, UT, 84606, USA.
Henry Joseph OConnellCanary Speech, Inc., 1800 Novell Place, Suite H51, Provo, UT, 84606, USA.
Yusuke YoshikawaDepartment of Biostatistics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Kanako TeramotoDepartment of Biostatistics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Kiyomasa NakatsukaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Satoshi SaitoDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Masafumi IharaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Misa TakegamiDepartment of Public Health and Health Policy, School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kunihiro NishimuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, 6-1 Kishibe-Simmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Voice is a potential biomarker of cognitive impairment because mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can cause changes in speech patterns and tempo. Artificial intelligence (AI) can deliver voice biomarkers as prediction features, leading to a timely, noninvasive, and cost-effective detection of cognitive impairment. This study aimed to develop and test prediction models utilizing voice biomarkers to detect cognitive impairment, which AI derived from voice data of unstructured conversations in community-dwelling adults in Japan. Methods: This observational study with a cross-sectional design, included 1461 community-dwelling adults. The outcome was cognitive impairment assessed by the Memory Performance Index score from the MCI screen. Voice data was collected from 3-min open-question interviews and extracted voice biomarkers based on acoustic and prosodic features as a 512-dimensional vector of individual voice information using the voice generator, Wav2Vec2. Other considerable predictors were age, sex, and education. We developed cognitive impairment prediction models by applying the extreme gradient boosting decision tree algorithm and a deep neural network model using 979 participants. Prediction performances were tested by area under the curves (AUCs) in 482 participants who were not used for model development. Findings: We had 967 women (66·2%), 526 cognitive impairment (36·0%) participants with mean (standard deviation) age and education years of 79·5 (6·3) years old and 11·6 (2·2) years, respectively. The inclusion of voice biomarkers significantly improved AUCs (95% confidence intervals), from 0·80 (0·76, 0·84) to 0·88 (0·84, 0·91) for the age sex model and from 0·78 (0·73, 0·82) to 0·89 (0·86, 0·92) for the age sex and education model (p < 0·0001 for both comparisons by DeLong test). Interpretation: Our prediction models for cognitive impairment using voice biomarkers can provide significantly timesaving MCI screening with high prediction performances (AUC = 0·89). Voice biomarkers significantly contributed to improving prediction performance. Funding: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR Phase 3 Fund), the Intramural Research Fund of Cardiovascular Diseases of the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, and JSPS KAKENHI.

Indexed as

AIMild cognitive impairmentPrediction modelVoice biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40673165
PMCPMC12266181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.