Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673137›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Mechanism study on improving chloropicrin fumigation effect by covering fumigated soil with appropriate thickness film.

Chunyan Dai, Minghua Li, Rongfeng Pu, Yameng Lin, Hualin Liu, Yuan Liu, Xiuming Cui, Peiran Liao, Ye Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chunyan Dai *School of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Minghua Li *School of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Rongfeng PuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Yameng LinSchool of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Hualin LiuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Yuan LiuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Xiuming CuiSchool of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Peiran LiaoSchool of Chinese Materia Medica, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ye YangSchool of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: To investigate the effect of cover thickness on fumigation efficacy following CP treatment, this study compared soil temperature, humidity, CP residue, microbial diversity, and crop parameters under soil covered with films of 0.06 mm (6S) and 0.08 mm (8S) thickness after CP fumigation. Results and discussion: The 6S film showed less degradation, higher transparency, tensile strength, and elongation at break than 8S. Soil temperature (ST) was lower, and soil water content (SWC) higher under 6S mulch film application with CP fumigation (F6S) compared to 8S (F8S). On the 14th day of fumigation, the CP content of F6S treatment was 28.97% higher than that of F8S treatment. F6S increased beneficial microbial phyla and genera such as

Indexed as

continuous cropping obstaclemulch film applicationpersistencesoil fumigationsoil microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID40673137
PMCPMC12263597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.