Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673135›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025

Decision regret in patients with head-and-neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

Anna-Maria Tews, Andreas Hinz, Valentin Magnus, Anna Boide, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Clemens Seidel, Nils Henrik Nicolay, Alexander Rühle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decision regret in patients with rectal cancer undergoing multimodal therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna-Maria TewsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas HinzComprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Valentin MagnusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Anna BoideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Anja Mehnert-TheuerkaufComprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Clemens SeidelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils Henrik NicolayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander RühleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Head-and-neck cancer patients often face decisions between treatment options with similar oncological outcomes. In this context, decision regret becomes a central concern, particularly within the framework of shared decision-making. This study aims to assess the prevalence of decision regret and identify associated risk factors among head-and-neck cancer patients. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included patients who underwent curative radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Decision regret was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Additional patient-reported outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and fear of cancer progression (FoP). Results: Of 300 eligible patients, 192 participated and filled out the DRS. The median age was 59 years (IQR, 45-65), and the median time between the end of radiotherapy and study participation was 45.5 months (IQR, 24-68.5). No decision regret (0 points) in terms of radiotherapy was reported by 27 %, mild regret (1-25 points) by 34 %, and high regret (>25 points) by 39 %. The mean (SD) DRS score regarding radiotherapy, systemic treatment, and surgery was 23.6 (22.4), 20.8 (19.3), and 20.9 (22.2), respectively. Decision regret was associated with HRQoL ( Conclusions: More than one-third of head-and-neck cancer patients report high decision regret. These findings highlight the need for enhanced shared decision-making to mitigate decision regret in head-and-neck oncology.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyDecision regretFear of cancer progressionHead-and-neck cancerPsycho-oncologyQuality of lifeRadiotherapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID40673135
PMCPMC12266478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.