ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Decision regret in patients with head-and-neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of Customized Personas for Decision-Making Cognition Regarding Oral Microbiota Transplantation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decision regret in patients with rectal cancer undergoing multimodal therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Regret concerning treatment decisions in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors - a cross-sectional exploratory bicentric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Head-and-neck cancer patients often face decisions between treatment options with similar oncological outcomes. In this context, decision regret becomes a central concern, particularly within the framework of shared decision-making. This study aims to assess the prevalence of decision regret and identify associated risk factors among head-and-neck cancer patients. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included patients who underwent curative radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Decision regret was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Additional patient-reported outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and fear of cancer progression (FoP). Results: Of 300 eligible patients, 192 participated and filled out the DRS. The median age was 59 years (IQR, 45-65), and the median time between the end of radiotherapy and study participation was 45.5 months (IQR, 24-68.5). No decision regret (0 points) in terms of radiotherapy was reported by 27 %, mild regret (1-25 points) by 34 %, and high regret (>25 points) by 39 %. The mean (SD) DRS score regarding radiotherapy, systemic treatment, and surgery was 23.6 (22.4), 20.8 (19.3), and 20.9 (22.2), respectively. Decision regret was associated with HRQoL ( Conclusions: More than one-third of head-and-neck cancer patients report high decision regret. These findings highlight the need for enhanced shared decision-making to mitigate decision regret in head-and-neck oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.