ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Performance change while learning novel cognitive tasks as a potential identifier of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In healthy older adults (OA), the effects of amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition on cognitive functions involved in learning are unclear. Objective: This study aimed to determine how age, practice, and neuropsychological test performance are associated with performance change during the learning of three cognitive tasks, and if Aβ deposition impacts performance change in OA. Methods: Fifty-five OA and 28 young adults completed neuropsychological tests, and Aβ deposition was assessed in OA. Participants learned three cognitive tasks: stop-go normal task (SGNT), stop-go reverse task (SGRT), and Results: In the basic model, more practice resulted in a larger performance change for SGNT and SGRT, but not NBT. In the second basic model, after two NBT practice trials, performance change increased with greater amounts of Aβ deposition and worse information processing speed but, after three practice trials, decreased with greater amounts of Aβ deposition and worse information processing speed. Across the three tasks, greater Aβ deposition tended (non-significant trend) to be associated with smaller improvements after more practice. Conclusions: These results suggest that the ability to learn a cognitive task is maintained with age but is negatively impacted by Aβ deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.