Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673133›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports

Performance change while learning novel cognitive tasks as a potential identifier of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Lena M Hetrick, Haiying Chen, Ilana Levin, Samuel N Lockhart, Michael E Miller, Paul J Laurienti, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Christina E Hugenschmidt, Lisa A Zukowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lena M HetrickDepartment of Neuroscience, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0062-0970
Haiying ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Ilana LevinDepartment of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
Samuel N LockhartSticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0893-5420
Michael E MillerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Paul J LaurientiDepartment of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Stephen B KritchevskySticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Christina E HugenschmidtSticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9126-7565
Lisa A ZukowskiDepartment of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-1564

Funding

Wake Forest University School of Medicine Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072947 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE CRAFT · 2021 to 2026
$24.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In healthy older adults (OA), the effects of amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition on cognitive functions involved in learning are unclear. Objective: This study aimed to determine how age, practice, and neuropsychological test performance are associated with performance change during the learning of three cognitive tasks, and if Aβ deposition impacts performance change in OA. Methods: Fifty-five OA and 28 young adults completed neuropsychological tests, and Aβ deposition was assessed in OA. Participants learned three cognitive tasks: stop-go normal task (SGNT), stop-go reverse task (SGRT), and Results: In the basic model, more practice resulted in a larger performance change for SGNT and SGRT, but not NBT. In the second basic model, after two NBT practice trials, performance change increased with greater amounts of Aβ deposition and worse information processing speed but, after three practice trials, decreased with greater amounts of Aβ deposition and worse information processing speed. Across the three tasks, greater Aβ deposition tended (non-significant trend) to be associated with smaller improvements after more practice. Conclusions: These results suggest that the ability to learn a cognitive task is maintained with age but is negatively impacted by Aβ deposition.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamyloid-βcognitive dysfunctionmemory and learning

Identifiers

PMID40673133
PMCPMC12264413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.