ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, deep learning, and hybrid AI for invasiveness stratification of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Correlation analysis between growth heterogeneity and genetic mutations in resected subsolid lung adenocarcinoma based on long-term computed tomography (CT) follow-up.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based density proportion analysis in predicting the invasiveness of neoplastic ground-glass nodules.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The development of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) could help predict their growth patterns and facilitate more precise identification of nodules that require close monitoring or early intervention. Previous studies have demonstrated the indolent growth pattern of GGNs and developed growth prediction models; however, these investigations predominantly focused on solitary GGN. This study aimed to investigate the natural history of multiple pulmonary GGNs and develop and validate growth prediction models based on computed tomography (CT) features, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) as well as compare their predictive performances. Methods: Patients with two or more persistent GGNs who underwent CT scans between October 2010 and November 2023 and had at least 3 years of follow-up without radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The growth of GGN is defined as an increase in mean diameter by at least 2 mm, an increase in volume by at least 30%, or the emergence or enlargement of a solid component by at least 2 mm. Based on the interval changes during follow-up, the enrolled patients and GGNs were categorized into growth and non-growth groups. The data were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical model, Radiomics model, DL model, Clinical-Radiomics model, and Clinical-DL model were constructed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 732 GGNs [mean diameter (interquartile range, IQR), 5.5 (4.5-6.5) mm] from 231 patients (mean age 54.1±9.9 years; 26.4% male, 73.6% female) were included. Of the 156 (156/231, 67.5%) patients with GGN growth, the fastest-growing GGN had a volume doubling time (VDT) and mass doubling time (MDT) of 2,285 (IQR, 1,369-3,545) and 2,438 (IQR, 1,361-4,140) days, respectively. Among the growing 272 (272/732, 37.2%) GGNs, the median VDT and MDT were 2,934 (IQR, 1,648-4,491) and 2,875 (IQR, 1,619-5,148) days, respectively. Lobulation (P=0.049), vacuole (P=0.009), initial volume (P=0.01), and mass (P=0.01) were risk factors of GGN growth. The sensitivity and specificity of the Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 77.2% and 80.0%, 77.2% and 79.3%, 75.9% and 77.8%, 59.5% and 75.6%, 82.3% and 86.7%, 78.5% and 80.7%, respectively. The AUC for Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 0.876, 0.869, 0.845, 0.735, 0.908, and 0.887, respectively. Conclusions: Multiple pulmonary GGNs exhibit indolent biological behaviour. The Clinical-Radiomics model demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting the growth of multiple GGNs compared to Clinical, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-DL models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.