Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673070›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

Development and deployment of robots in a bronchoscopy suite.

Irene Riestra Guiance, Christopher Kapp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Interventional pulmonology.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irene Riestra GuianceSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher KappSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of bronchoscopy has undergone remarkable evolution since its inception, transforming from a means to remove a foreign body, to the first rudimentary flexible diagnostic tool, into its current state as a sophisticated platform for both diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. The advent of robotic-assisted bronchoscopy represents one of the most significant milestones in this progression, offering unprecedented precision and safety in pulmonary procedures. This article reviews the data bolstering robotic-assisted bronchoscopy and the associated tools that can advance diagnostic yield, provides some practical tips for setting up your bronchoscopy suite, and outlines future directions.

Identifiers

PMID40673070
PMCPMC12260913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.