Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673069›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

Indwelling pleural catheters and medical thoracoscopy.

Valentina Luzzi, Anna L Lindahl, Sara Tomassetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Interventional pulmonology.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valentina LuzziUnit of Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Anna L LindahlUnit of Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-5108
Sara TomassettiUnit of Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4781-6539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores the complementary roles of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) and medical thoracoscopy (MT) in the evaluation and management of unexplained exudative pleural effusions, including malignant pleural effusion. IPCs offer a minimally invasive strategy for long-term outpatient management, which is particularly advantageous for patients with non-expandable lungs or limited functional status. Conversely, MT remains the gold standard for diagnostic accuracy and facilitates therapeutic procedures such as pleurodesis under direct visualisation. Recent evidence supports the integration of IPCs and MT as a hybrid approach, offering synergistic benefits including enhanced symptom control, reduced hospital admissions and improved patient-centred outcomes. This review synthesises current literature to provide a practical and evidence-based overview of these techniques and their evolving role in pleural disease management.

Identifiers

PMID40673069
PMCPMC12260916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.