Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673042›Full record

ArticleTH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Patient's Awareness of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Canadian Nationwide Survey.

Ana C Pizzarossa, Andrea Penaloza, Kristina Vrotniakaite-Bajerciene, Rufaro Chitsike, Vicky Tagalakis, Susan Calverley, Marc Carrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana C PizzarossaHemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Hospital de Clínicas "Dr Manuel Quintela," Montevideo, Uruguay.
Andrea PenalozaDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa at the Ottawa Hospital and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Kristina Vrotniakaite-BajercieneDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa at the Ottawa Hospital and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Rufaro ChitsikeDivision of Medicine (Hematology), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Vicky TagalakisDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Susan CalverleyThrombosis Canada, Ontario, Canada.
Marc CarrierDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa at the Ottawa Hospital and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 20% of patients with cancer will have cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its clinical importance, CAT awareness in cancer patients and caregivers remains low. We sought to assess the patients' knowledge of CAT through a national survey. Materials and Methods: A survey assessing knowledge of different aspects of CAT was developed by a steering committee including four clinicians with expertise in CAT and a patient partner with lived experience. Survey dissemination among patients with cancer occurred through the Environics network, the Thrombosis Canada member network, the Thrombosis Canada social media platforms, and was advertised through Instagram and Facebook, and the Canadian Cancer Survivor Network newsletter. Results: Out of the 312 patients with cancer or survivors who responded to the survey, 179 (57.4%) were female, and 118 (37.8%) were over 65 years old. Overall, 119 patients (38.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.7-49.8%) reported having no knowledge of CAT. Only 84 (26.9%, 95% CI: 22.1-32.2%) and 94 (30.1%, 95% CI: 25.1-35.6%) patients reported receiving education about their underlying risk of CAT or education about signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism, respectively. A total of 66 (21%, 95% CI: 16.8-26.1%) patients reported being informed by a health care professional about considering thromboprophylaxis. Patients were interested in learning more about the risk of CAT, its associated risk factors, and the benefits and potential side effects of thromboprophylaxis. Conclusion: Many patients with cancer lack awareness or knowledge of CAT. Our results highlight ongoing education and awareness of the CAT burden.

Indexed as

anticoagulantsneoplasiaspulmonary embolismvenous thromboembolismvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID40673042
PMCPMC12265400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.