ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Beyond the cut: a cross-sectional analysis of the long-term clinical and functional impact of cesarean section scars.
Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of cesarean section scar on decision regret and body image: a cross-sectional study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and functional implications of cesarean section (CS) skin scars on women's lives, emphasizing the relationship between scar characteristics and quality of life. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, women older than 18 years old who had undergone CS with a Pfannenstiel incision within the past 6-36 months were evaluated. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) were used to assess clinical scar parameters. Functionality was appraised using eight questions derived from the International Classification of Functionality, Disability, and Health (ICF). The association between scar appearance scores and functionality questions was analyzed statistically. Results: Ninety-six women were assessed, revealing that appearance and satisfaction with appearance had the worst scores on the PSAQ. Scar irregularity was the most frequently reported scar characteristic on the POSAS. On the ICF-derived questionnaire, the "self-care" domain was the most affected, with women reporting problems on activities such as choosing swimwear and lingeries. There was a significant correlation (p < 0,05) between the women dissatisfaction with the scar appearance and impairment in 'interpersonal interactions and relationships' and 'self-care', as the "domestic life" domain wasn't affected. Conclusions: Cesarean section skin scars can lead to dissatisfaction and functional impairments, affecting women's quality of life. These findings underscore the necessity for multidisciplinary care and thorough discussions about delivery methods to improve post-surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.