Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673030›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Pathophysiological mechanisms in severe preeclampsia: role of upregulated proteins in blood pressure, extracellular matrix and immunity.

Caroline Cristina Pinto-Souza, Julyane Natsumi Saito Kaihara, Bruno César Rossini, Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli, Lucilene Delazari Dos Santos, Valéria Cristina Sandrim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Second-trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule-out.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline Cristina Pinto-SouzaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu Departamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia BotucatuSP Brasil Departamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-9550
Julyane Natsumi Saito KaiharaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu Departamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia BotucatuSP Brasil Departamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-8488
Bruno César RossiniUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Biotecnologia e Bioprocessos São Paulo Brasil Departamento de Biotecnologia e Bioprocessos, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-9610
Ricardo de Carvalho CavalliUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Ribeirão PretoSP Brasil Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-4914
Lucilene Delazari Dos SantosUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu BotucatuSP Brasil Instituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil; Programas de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Tropicais e em Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (Biotecnologia Médica), Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5832-1825
Valéria Cristina SandrimUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu Departamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia BotucatuSP Brasil Departamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6168-7470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the plasma protein profiles between 7 preeclampsia patients with severe features (PE+) and 7 preeclampsia patients without severe features (PE-) and 10 healthy pregnancies (HP); identify differentially expressed proteins among these groups and explore the altered signaling pathways and their association with the severity of this cardiovascular condition. Methods: Plasma proteins were quantified using mass spectrometry, followed by comprehensive bioinformatics and statistical analyses. Protein identification and annotation were performed using UniProt and PatternLab for Proteomics. Multivariate statistical analyses, including PLS-DA and sPLS-DA, as well as VIP score evaluation and Volcano plot visualization, were conducted with MetaboAnalyst to assess group separation and identify key discriminative features. Functional enrichment and pathway analyses were carried out using Metascape. Results: Using a fold change and volcano plot validation of 1.2, comparisons between HP and PE+ revealed that proteins such as AMBP (inter-alpha trypsin inhibitor light chain), VTN (vitronectin), CLU (clusterin), F2 (prothrombin), and PZP (pregnancy zone protein) were upregulated in PE+. Conversely, ITIH4 (inter-alpha trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4), APOL1 (apolipoprotein 1) and SERPIND1 (heparin cofactor II) were downregulated in PE+ relative to HP. When comparing HP with PE-, SERPINA3 (alpha-1-antichymotrypsin) and HBB (hemoglobin subunit beta) were downregulated in PE-. Between PE- and PE+, APCS (serum amyloid P component) and HBB were upregulated in PE+; whereas SERPINC1 (antithrombin), PSG1 (pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 1), ITIH4, and C5 (complement C5) were downregulated in PE+ compared to PE-. Conclusion: These findings offer valuable insights into the different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the two subgroups of PE. The upregulated proteins in PE+ (AMBP, VTN, CLU, F2, PZP, APCS, and HBB) play key roles in regulating blood pressure, modulating the extracellular matrix and influencing immune responses. Overall, this research deepens our understanding of the complexity and clinical significance of PE.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood ProteinsExtracellular MatrixPre-EclampsiaAdultFemaleHumansPregnancySeverity of Illness IndexUp-RegulationBlood ProteinsBlood pressureExtracellular matrixHypertensionImmunityPlasma proteinsPre-eclampsiaSevere features

Identifiers

PMID40673030
PMCPMC12266872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.