ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Impact of legal regulation on elective cesarean sections in a secondary complexity maternity hospital in São Paulo state.
Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cesarean section rates in Lucas do Rio Verde, Brazil: Assessing the impact of socioeconomic status and maternal and neonatal outcomes.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of São Paulo State Law n° 17.137/2019 on the cesarean section rate at a public secondary-level maternity hospital and to analyze predictive factors and complications associated with cesarean under request. This law was enacted to allow pregnant women in São Paulo to request a cesarean section without medical indication. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed medical records of pregnant women ≥ 39 weeks gestation attended at the Ribeirão Preto Women's Health Reference Center (CRSMRP-Mater). Two groups were evaluated: 1,999 patients before the law (July 2018-July 2019) and 3,207 after its implementation (August 2019-July 2021, excluding the suspension period). Descriptive and analytical statistical methods were applied. Results: The overall cesarean rates increased significantly from 23.6% to 27.7% (p < 0.01), with 15,1% of cesareans during the law period being under maternal request (134 patients). A previous cesarean was the only factor significantly associated with electing a new cesarean. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the law period (p < 0.01), possibly reflecting the increased cesarean rate. No significant differences were observed in maternal or neonatal complications between cesareans under request and those conducted for medical reasons. Conclusion: São Paulo State Law n°. 17.137/2019 was associated with an increased cesarean rate in CRSMRP-Mater. The findings highlight the need for robust educational approaches and evidence-based obstetric practices to reduce unnecessary elective cesareans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.