ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Maternal and perinatal characteristics associated with congenital anomalies: a case-control study.
Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Brain-Face Connection in Holoprosencephaly: Case Report and Literature Review.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify the patterns and factors associated with congenital anomalies in newborns from a tertiary hospital maternity ward. Methods: A case-control study was conducted at the Hospital Regional do Sudoeste Walter Alberto Pecóits in Francisco Beltrão (PR), between December 2023 and September 2024. Among the 1,400 births that occurred in the hospital's delivery room between December 1, 2023, and the end of September 2024, 37 newborns (2.6%) with congenital anomalies were identified during the study period. A total of 37 case mothers and 120 controls were included (a ratio of approximately 1:3). The sociodemographic variables included maternal age, residence, marital status, race, education level, family income, and maternal occupation. The behavioral variables considered smoking, alcohol consumption, and the use of drugs or medications during pregnancy. The fetal variables included the number of pregnancies, gestational age, type of delivery, miscarriage, Apgar score, birth weight, sex, fetal status, congenital anomalies, and the number of prenatal visits, with a minimum of six (one in the first trimester, two in the second, and three in the third), following the Ministry of Health guidelines. Results: Among 1,400 live births, 37 cases of congenital anomalies were identified (2.6%, 95% CI: 1.80-3.48), while the control group included 120 women with newborns without congenital anomalies. Among cases, isolated anomalies were most common (62.2%), predominantly affecting the cardiovascular system (27.0%), followed by recognized syndromes (21.6%) and multiple malformations (16.2%). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and medical record reviews. Bivariate analysis revealed significant associations between congenital anomalies and a family history of congenital anomalies (p = 0.02), low apgar scores at the 1st and 5th minutes (p < 0.01), and fetal status at birth (p < 0.01). Model 1, which integrates family history of congenital anomalies, apgar score at the 5th minute, and fetal status, showed the best predictive fit, consistent with previous findings. Bayesian logistic regression highlighted this model with the lowest AIC (295.98) and BIC (326.22) values, achieving 89% predictive accuracy. Conclusion: These results reinforce the importance of family history and neonatal vitality in the context of congenital anomalies, indicating the need for future studies to confirm these findings and improve prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.