ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Prevalence of vaginal laxity in primiparous women six months after birth.
Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Conservative and Surgical Interventions for Vaginal Laxity: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the prevalence of VL in primiparous women undergoing vaginal birth or caesarean section; and its association with obstetric, urinary, intestinal and sexual factors for its occurrence. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study carried out between July 2021 and January 2023. Primiparous women who underwent vaginal birth or caesarean section without complaints of VL during pregnancy were included. Clinical and obstetric data were collected and participants completed questionnaires on the impact of urinary incontinence (ICIQ-SF), vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS) and sexual distress (FSDS-R) at recruitment and six-months postpartum. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed, considering VL as the outcome and p=0.05. Results: One hundred participants were included for data analysis. The prevalence of VL was 8%. In the univariate analysis, SUI, urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), coital incontinence, constipation and the ICIQ-VS and ICIQ-SF scores were associated with VL. The ICIQ-VS, FSDS-R and ICIQ-SF scores increased the risk of VL by one-fold. However, only UUI (OR 10.50(CI 95% 1.90-58.10), coital incontinence (OR 42.00(CI 95% 3.11-566.38), and ICIQ-VS (vaginal symptoms OR 1.32(CI 95% 1.05-1.66) and ICIQ-SF (OR 1.25(CI 95% 1.02-1.54), scores remained associated with VL in multivariate-analysis. Conclusion: The prevalence of VL in primiparous women was lower than that reported in other studies and showed an association with the occurrence of vaginal symptoms, UUI and coital incontinence, six- months postpartum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.