ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Association between coronavirus 2 infection and preeclampsia among unvaccinated women.
Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) infection and preeclampsia (PE); to verify whether the strength of the association differs according to the infection onset (trimester of pregnancy). Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Included women giving birth at a public hospital in Brazil from July 2020 to January 2021. All women were offered testing for COVID-19 during birth; they were also offered to test during prenatal care if symptomatics or contactants. Excluded women not tested. Compared the frequency of PE as well as of PE superimposed to chronic hypertension (PESCH) in women with versus without infection. Associations were accessed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Among 1,575 women included, 288 (18.3%) had infection, 53 (3.4%) had PE, and 32 (2.1%) had PESCH. In univariate analysis, infection was significantly associated with PE, but not with PESCH. We then considered only PE as the outcome. The multivariable model included PE, infection, primigravida, fewer than seven prenatal visits. We found association between infection and PE, adjusted odds ratio 2.1; p=0.017. Women infected in the first trimester had a higher frequency of PE than those with infections in the second/third trimester, suggesting a temporal sequence, but the difference wasn't significant (p=0.054). Conclusion: Our data suggests association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and PE without chronic hypertension. The greater frequency of PE in women who had infection in the first trimester suggests a temporal sequence, but the small numbers are a limitation. Studies with larger samples are welcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.