ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
A phase 2 study of tislelizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05247619 (A Clinical Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: a systematic review and exploratory network meta-analysis of immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of combined immune therapy for advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Combined neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and nomogram for predicting progression-free survival in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with tislelizumab plus low-dose bevacizumab and standard chemotherapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study (NCT05247619) enrolled adult patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1. Patients received tislelizumab (200 mg), bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), paclitaxel (175 mg/m Findings: Between May 2022 and March 2023, a total of 51 patients were enrolled from 8 centers across China (median age: 54 years), and most had distant metastases at enrollment (54.9%). Median PFS reached 22.6 months (95% CI: 14.6, not reached). The ORR was 91.5% (95% CI: 79.6, 97.6), DCR was 100% (95% CI: 92.5, 100.0) and the 18-month DOR rate was 51.5% (95% CI: 31.0, 68.7). Anemia and decreased platelet count were the most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent (21.6% and 19.6%, respectively) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, 17.6% each). Grade ≥3 TRAEs of special interest associated with bevacizumab were proteinuria (3.9%), fistula and vaginal bleeding (2.0% each). Interpretation: Tislelizumab in combination with low-dose bevacizumab and chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy with favorable safety profile as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Pioneer R&D Program of Zhejiang (2023SDYXS0001, 2022C03031) and by BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.