ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
MOOC construction for life education in Chinese universities: an analytical study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of emotional value in digital teaching resources on learning motivation-an empirical analysis based on a questionnaire survey.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The post-pandemic transformation in Pathophysiology teaching strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- "Internet+" Case-Based Learning Improves Perceived Learning Gains and Teaching Satisfaction in an Integrated Medical Curriculum: A Comparative Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the advancement of the Chinese "Internet Plus" paradigm, life education has expended through the implementation of Massive open online courses (MOOCs). However, limited research has focused on the present condition and attributes of the building of Chinese life education MOOCs. Objectives: To systematically analyze the current status and attributes of life education MOOCs in China, assess the quality of the courses, and give a reference for the development of life education MOOCs in the country. Methods: We select China's online education platform and utilize the search terms "Health OR Life OR Death OR Psychology OR Nutrition OR Exercise OR Well-being OR Love OR Ethics" to identify MOOCs pertinent to life education. Analyze and summarize the courses about platforms, schools, regions, objectives, contents, assessments, credit hours, number of sessions and number of learners. The quality of the course was assessed utilizing Quality Matters (QM). Results: In China, 129 life education MOOCs were provided in six online education platforms. The quantity of courses originating from "double first-class" universities, general universities and higher vocational universities was 44, 40, and 45, respectively. The quantity of courses from eastern regions was 106, while from western regions it was 23. The course contents covered three domains: life education, death education, and life value education. Credit hours, course sessions and the number of course learners exhibit statistically significant differences among regions and school types ( Conclusion: Chinese life education MOOC is resource-rich and has a substantial learner base. However, issues persist, including inconsistent course quality, limited personalization of course content, and significant disparities between eastern and western regions. In the future, Chinese life education MOOC should align with the development in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, address the disparities between Eastern and Western areas, and integrate with worldwide platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.