Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Therapeutic effects of melittin on paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathic pain and spinal neuronal hyperactivity in male rats.

Daxian Li, Yan Wu, Lirong Chang, Yizhi Song, Xiaoqiang Du, Fenqin Xue, Yang Liu, Jie Wu, Tianlong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Melittin attenuates imiquimod-induced psoriatic dermatitis in mice: a role for autophagy activation via PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway suppression.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Peptide-Based Approaches for Pain Relief and Healing in Wounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daxian LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan WuBeijing Key Laboratory of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lirong ChangBeijing Key Laboratory of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yizhi SongBeijing Key Laboratory of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqiang DuBeijing Key Laboratory of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fenqin XueCore Facilities Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jie WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tianlong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As a taxane-based cytostatic agent, paclitaxel holds a broad spectrum of life-saving properties. However, its use is frequently limited by painful neuropathy in the extremities, which severely hinders the ultimate prognosis of cancer survivors. While bee venom therapy has shown promise in alleviating chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain, the analgesic potential of its primary bioactive components, such as melittin and phospholipase A2 (bvPLA2), remains uncharacterized. This study investigated the ameliorative effects of melittin against paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats through integrated behavioral, Methods: Paclitaxel was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) at a total dose of 8 mg/kg. Cold and mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia were quantified using the acetone drop and von Frey filament tests. To compare the therapeutic properties of bee venom ingredients, either melittin (0.5 mg/kg) or bvPLA2 (0.12 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously at ST36 (Zusanli acupoint). Results: ST36 treatment with melittin, but not bvPLA2, markedly impeded mechanical and cold hypersensitivity. Electrophysiological analysis revealed that paclitaxel induced spontaneous and stimulus-evoked hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons. Melittin selectively suppressed evoked neuronal activities (i.e., acute responses and after-discharges) without modulating the spontaneous firing of WDR neurons. Neuropharmacological investigation demonstrated that the effects of melittin were fully reversed by noradrenaline depletion, whereas serotonin depletion had no effect. Discussion: Our findings establish that melittin treatment at ST36 could ease paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain by partially attenuating the hyperexcitable state of spinal WDR neurons. Furthermore, these ameliorative actions were mediated by the specific recruitment of the endogenous noradrenergic system. This study provides novel evidence supporting melittin as a targeted symptomatic agent for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy, which would advance the development of promising analgesic strategies in oncological care.

Indexed as

acupunctureanalgesiabee venomchemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathyelectrophysiological recordingnoradrenergic systemwide dynamic range neuron

Identifiers

PMID40672870
PMCPMC12263631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.