Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A new dimension of simplified science communication: the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts.

Sara Salzmann, Charlotte Walther, Kai Kaspar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara Salzmann *Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Charlotte Walther *Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kai KasparDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A common approach to make scientific information more accessible for the broader public, is making it easier to understand and translating it into more appealing formats, like short and entertaining online videos. However, simplifying scientific content can have negative impact on consumers, as it can lead to the so-called easiness effect, a cognitive bias which can include an overestimation of one's own competencies. In the context of scientific studies, this bias has previously only been demonstrated by comparing text-based scientific abstracts with easier-to-understand plain language summaries (PLS). With several unsuccessful approaches in research to reduce the easiness effect, a promising new method might be using debiasing videos as they have been shown to reduce cognitive biases in other contexts. The present study expands the research by exploring the easiness effect in animated video abstracts and investigates whether a debiasing video can reduce it. Method: This experiment realized a 2 (video abstract type: PLS versus scientific abstracts) × 2 (debiasing video: shown versus not shown) between-participants design. Overall, 179 participants received four abstracts and rated (1) study comprehensibility, (2) perceived study credibility, (3) confidence in one's ability to evaluate the study, and (4) perceived ability to make decisions without further information. Also, intended consumer reactions (knowledge-enhancing and social media reactions) were collected. Results: Animated PLS, compared to animated scientific abstracts, actually enhanced comprehensibility of scientific content. This effect was accompanied by a significant easiness effect, as PLS were perceived as more credible and they produced a higher confidence in the recipients' perceived ability to evaluate the study. No differences in consumer reactions were observed between abstract types. Also, the video-based debiasing intervention did not affect study evaluation. Discussion: The easiness effect can be reliably generated in video abstracts and it is very robust, as it persists even if a debiasing intervention is carried out beforehand. This study underscores the need for responsible communication strategies in science popularization and shifts the focus to the increasingly popular video abstracts. The results provide a valuable starting point for further research on how video-based science communication can be optimized to convey scientific information effectively.

Indexed as

cognitive biasdebiasing interventioneasiness effectknowledge-enhancing reactionsscience communicationscience popularizationsocial media reactionsvideo abstracts

Identifiers

PMID40672858
PMCPMC12263670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.