ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Inhibition of return emerges with non-predictive spatial cueing of the stop-signal.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to suppress an inappropriate response can be influenced by several factors, including providing information on where to pay attention. For example, the spatial prediction of the stop signal location enhances inhibitory control in a Stop Signal Task. Here, we test whether a non-predictive spatial cueing improves inhibitory control as well. In this experiment, participants observed a vertical bar moving from a central position toward one of two circles on the screen. They were asked to press a key when the bar's motion was interrupted (go signal). In 25% of the trials (stop signal trials), after a variable delay following the go signal, a visual target (stop signal) appeared in one of the circles, requiring participants to inhibit their response to the go signal. In half of these trials, the stop signal appeared on the same side as the go signal (valid condition), and in the other half, it appeared on the opposite side (invalid condition). Our results show a facilitation effect for stop trials in the invalid condition compared to the valid condition, for targets occurring from 300 ms onward the go signal. This suggests an involvement of Inhibition of Return (IOR) in affecting the stop signal detection during motor control. Our findings provide new insights into the interaction between attentional processes and motor control, highlighting a temporally focused influence of exogenous attention in shaping motor inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.