Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672736›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025

Dupilumab treatment for prurigo nodularis: a retrospective study of 76 patients.

Yinyu Zhao, Chenxing Gao, Hong Leng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yinyu ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chenxing GaoDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hong LengDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic pruritic and inflammatory skin disorder and dupilumab is currently the only biologic agent approved in China for the treatment. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in managing moderate to severe PN through a retrospective study of 76 patients. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical and laboratory data from PN patients who received regular dupilumab treatment for 52 weeks at the Dermatology Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between March 2021 and June 2023. Assessments were made at baseline (week 0), and at weeks 4, 8, 16, 26, and 52 using prurigo nodule counts, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores, Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores to evaluate clinical symptoms and pruritus. Adverse events occurring post-treatment were also recorded to assess the drug's safety and efficacy. Results: A total of 76 patients with moderate to severe PN were included in this study. By week 52, there were significant reductions in prurigo nodule counts, IGA scores, NRS scores, and DLQI scores. Prurigo nodule counts decreased from a baseline of 74.64 ±33.45 to 2.3 ±0.9, IGA scores from 3.53 ±0.54 to 0.54 ±0.33, NRS scores from 7.65 ±2.27 to 1.01 ±0.65, and DLQI scores from 18.46 ±4.53 to 1.55 ±0.68, with all differences being statistically significant ( Conclusions: Dupilumab effectively reduces the number of PN, improves IGA scores, alleviates pruritus, and enhances quality of life in patients with moderate to severe PN, with a high safety profile.

Indexed as

dupilumabefficacyprurigo nodularis

Identifiers

PMID40672736
PMCPMC12262036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.