ReviewJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2024
Syphilis Point-of-Care Tests (POCTs): Implementation Considerations in Canada.
Review in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the MedMira Multiplo® Complete Syphilis (TP/nTP) antibody test in a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Ottawa, Canada: increased rapid diagnosis and improved antibiotic stewardship.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Rapid/point-of-care syphilis testing in high-income countries: insights and implementation challenges from the authors' experience in Canada.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, management and prevention of anorectal sexually transmitted infections.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- The changing epidemiology of syphilis: new strategies for new challenges in China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Starting in the early 2000s, the rate of infectious syphilis in Canada began rising. Since the mid-2010s, the rate among females, particularly females in their reproductive years, has increased rapidly. Coincident with this shift, congenital syphilis has re-emerged in Canada in recent years. Infectious and congenital syphilis disproportionately impact communities affected by social and structural determinants of health, including homelessness and inadequate or inaccessible health care services. These realities underscore the importance of emerging strategies, including rapid diagnostic tests that can be deployed at the point of care, as tools to help reverse these trends. Increased access to testing is one of the pillars of the Pan-Canadian Framework for Action on Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections (STBBI) and the Government of Canada's STBBI Action Plan 2024-2030. The National Microbiology Laboratory Branch of the Public Health Agency of Canada has worked towards introducing rapid diagnostic tests including point-of-care tests (POCTs) for STBBI testing. With Health Canada's first approval of a syphilis POCT (bioLytical's INSTI MULTIPLEX HIV-1/2 Syphilis Ab Test) in 2023, it is timely to reflect on important implementation considerations for this and other syphilis POCTs in Canada. In this article, we aim to review antibody-detecting syphilis POCTs that are commercially available, their performance in recent Canadian field studies, and key contextual considerations for Canada in implementing POCTs for syphilis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.