ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Methylphenidate and Modafinil Mitigate Scopolamine-Induced Behavioral Alterations.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of modafinil and methylphenidate in a rat model of dementia induced by scopolamine. The degeneration of cholinergic neurons in dementia is linked to cognitive and motor deficits, and dopaminergic mechanisms play a crucial role in modulating cholinergic transmission. Given this, the study explored the potential role of psychostimulants in treating these disruptions. Both psychostimulants were administered orally in therapeutic doses: methylphenidate (10 mg/kg/day) and modafinil (75 mg/kg/day). The study assessed fine motor skills using the stationary rod test, cognitive function through tasks such as the maze and passive avoidance tests, and locomotor activity in both familiar and novel environments. Scopolamine injections (SC. 1 mg/kg) caused reduced locomotion, impaired motor skills, and memory dysfunction, all of which were improved with psychostimulant treatment. Behavioral sensitization was observed in the second week of treatment. Both methylphenidate and modafinil improved motor coordination and cognitive function. Methylphenidate showed more significant improvements, particularly in cognitive functions, while modafinil had a greater effect on increasing motor activity. However, the overall therapeutic efficacy was similar for both treatments. Notably, modafinil-induced locomotor sensitization, which requires further study to understand its implications. These findings highlight the potential of psychostimulants in treating dementia-related cognitive and motor deficits, suggesting their possible role in developing therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. However, the risks of long-term use, such as psychosis and addiction, should be carefully considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.