Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672605›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025

Development of a cardiovascular health score for diabetics based on the weighting of the contribution of diabetes-related mortality.

Xiaomeng Yang, Wanting Li, Suqing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaomeng YangSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wanting LiHospital Public Health Section, Wuhan Wuchang Hospital Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Suqing WangSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes-related mortalities encompass multiple causes, including cardiovascular disease, infections, and diabetic nephropathy, with cardiovascular death being the leading cause among them. This study aimed to develop a cardiovascular health score specifically suited for diabetic patients based on the Life's Essential 8 scoring system.

methodsThe study included 23,310 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and determined their mortality cause by linking the data to the National Death Index. The primary outcomes encompassed diabetes-related mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Assessment of mortality risk by Cardiovascular Health (CVH) using cox proportional risk modeling. Weighted quantile sum regression models were utilized to evaluate the contributions of eight CVH factors within their combined effects. Based on the results, the contributions of each factor were adjusted to create a new CVH score. The X-tile figure was used to select the optimal threshold value for reclassifying CVH levels in diabetic patients. The C-index and Decision Curve Analysis were applied to compare the predictive performance of the new CVH level with the original CVH level.

resultsAmong the 23,310 adults who participated in the study, 15,217 were normoglycemic, 5,923 were prediabetic, and 2,170 were diabetic. Among the three glycemic states, diabetics exhibited the highest diabetes-related mortality rate (4.52%), and also had the highest cardiovascular mortality rate (3.09%). For all subjects, the risk of diabetes-related mortality decreased by 51.13% for every 10-point increase in the total CVH score, the most important CVH component was blood glucose (contribution of 64.6%). For diabetics, the most important CVH component was blood pressure (contribution of 35.7%), followed by tobacco/nicotine exposure and diet quality (contribution of 18.7% and 18.5%). Notably, the newly adjusted CVH score, unlike the original one, was significantly associated with cardiovascular death (HR = 0.9720, 95% CI: 0.9573 to 0.9869). We chose 30 and 60 as cutoff values for reclassifying CVH levels in diabetic patients. The DCA results indicated that the reclassified CVH levels were superior predictors of diabetes-related deaths, cardiovascular deaths, and all-cause mortality in diabetic patients compared to the original CVH levels.

conclusionThe weight-adjusted CVH score effectively predicted the risk of cardiovascular mortality in diabetics. The predictive performance of the reclassified CVH levels exhibited significant improvement over the original CVH levels. Additionally, when managing health, greater emphasis should be placed on encouraging diabetic patients to monitor their blood pressure, quit smoking, and maintain a healthy diet.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular healthcomponent contributionsdiabetes-related mortalitydiabetic

Identifiers

PMID40672605
PMCPMC12261196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.