ArticleJournal of image and graphics2025
Automatic Detection and Classification of Cerebral Microbleeds Using 3D CNN.
Article in Journal of image and graphics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Deep Learning in Detecting Cerebral Microbleeds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral Microbleeds (CMBs) are referred to tiny foci of hemorrhage in brain parenchyma which are smaller than 5 (to 10) mm in size. The presence of CMBs is implicated in pathophysiology of cognitive impairment, dementia, radiation-induced vascular injury, traumatic brain injury, hypertensive microangiopathy, and aging. On brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, CMBs appear as hypointense foci, most notable on T2*-weighted or Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging (SWI). Detecting these tiny microbleeds with naked eye is a difficult and time-consuming task for radiologists. In this study we developed an algorithm for automatic detection of CMBs. We applied a two-step strategy: at first, we applied pre-processed 2D image dataset to You Only Look Once (YOLO V2) for detection of CMBs. Then, these detected CMBs locations are used to segment 3D patches from their original SWI volume in the datasets. Next, these patches are used as inputs for Convolution Neural Network (CNN). In the second step, we reduced the number of False Positives (FP) and improved our classification accuracy using 3D CNN. We used two datasets consisting of 979 patients: 879 of whom for training of models, and the remainder for independent validation. We were able to achieve an accuracy of 81% and reduce the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.