Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672473›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

MedReadCtrl: Personalizing medical text generation with readability-controlled instruction learning.

Hieu Tran, Zonghai Yao, Won Seok Jang, Sharmin Sultana, Allen Chang, Yuan Zhang, Hong Yu

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hieu TranCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Health Care, MA, USA.
Zonghai YaoCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Health Care, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-8410
Won Seok JangCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Health Care, MA, USA.
Sharmin SultanaCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Health Care, MA, USA.
Allen ChangDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Yuan ZhangSchool of Nursing, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, UMass Lowell, MA, USA.
Hong YuCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Health Care, MA, USA.

Funding

Social and behavioral determinants of health and Alzheimer’s Disease: Cohort study of the US military veteran populationR01AG080670 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI HONG YU · 2023 to 2026
$4.5M
Social and behavioral determinants of MOUD utilization and opioid overdoseR01DA056470 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI Wenjun Li, DAVID A SMELSON · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Evaluating the impact of U.S. eviction moratoria on acute care use and costsR01NR020868 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TSAI, JACK · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
HSRD VA I01 HX003711NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080670NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056470NINR NIH HHS R01 NR020868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative AI has demonstrated strong potential in healthcare, from clinical decision support to patient-facing chatbots that improve outcomes. A critical challenge for deployment is effective human-AI communication, where content must be both personalized and understandable. We introduce MedReadCtrl, a readability-controlled instruction tuning framework that enables LLMs to adjust output complexity without compromising meaning. Evaluations of nine datasets and three tasks across medical and general domains show that MedReadCtrl achieves significantly lower readability instruction-following errors than GPT-4 (e.g., 1.39 vs. 1.59 on ReadMe, p<0.001) and delivers substantial gains on unseen clinical tasks (e.g., +14.7 ROUGE-L, +6.18 SARI on MTSamples). Experts consistently preferred MedReadCtrl (71.7% vs. 23.3%), especially at low literacy levels. These gains reflect MedReadCtrl's ability to restructure clinical content into accessible, readability-aligned language while preserving medical intent, offering a scalable solution to support patient education and expand equitable access to AI-enabled care.

Identifiers

PMID40672473
PMCPMC12265760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.