ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
A deep learning-based image analysis model for automated scoring of horizontal ocular movement disorders.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study proposes a deep learning-based image analysis method for automated scoring of the severity of horizontal ocular movement disorders and evaluates its performance against traditional manual scoring methods. Methods: A total of 2,565 ocular images were prospectively collected from 164 patients with ocular movement disorders and 121 healthy subjects. These images were labeled and used as the training set for the RetinaEye automatic scoring model. Additionally, 184 binocular gaze images (left and right turns) were collected from 92 patients with limited horizontal ocular movement, serving as the test set. Manual and automatic scoring were performed on the test set using ImageJ and RetinaEye, respectively. Furthermore, the consistency and correlation between the two scoring methods were assessed. Results: RetinaEye successfully identified the centers of both pupils, as well as the positions of the medial and lateral canthi. It also automatically calculated the horizontal ocular movement scores based on the pixel coordinates of these key points. The model demonstrated high accuracy in identifying key points, particularly the lateral canthi. In the test group, manual and automated scoring results showed a high level of consistency and positive correlation among all affected oculi ( Conclusion: The automatic scoring method based on RetinaEye demonstrated high consistency with manual scoring results. This new method objectively assesses the severity of horizontal ocular movement disorders and holds great potential for diagnosis and treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.