SynthesisFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2025
Recognition of the microbial metabolite
Synthesis in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADAM10's combined influence on the diagnostic usefulness of IL 22, IL 10, IL-17 A, and IL-17D in autism spectrum disorders: Predicted role on gut leakiness as co-morbidity.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Maternal and infant gut microbiome.iMeta · 2026Review
- The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Autism: Associations, Causal Inference, and Interventions-A Narrative Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, research has focused on the gut-brain axis and its microbial metabolites as potential etiological or physiopathological agents of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Elevated levels of the organic compound Methods: A search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases in May 2024. The Axis critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies included in the review. Three independent reviewers examined the identified records and performed data extraction. Results: The systematic review yielded 15 articles, of which only 6 were ultimately used for the meta-analysis. Urinary Conclusion: This meta-analysis validates that in ASD an increased level of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.