ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
The cross-sectional association between cardiometabolic index and abdominal aortic calcification in U.S. adults: evidence from NHANES 2013-2014.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between the modified cardiometabolic index and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in a population with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3: a nationwide prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The association between modified cardiometabolic index and cardiovascular disease risk in adults with early cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a prospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cardiometabolic index (CMI) is a novel composite measure that integrates assessments of abdominal adiposity and lipid profiles. While abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a well-established marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and systemic metabolic dysregulation, the association between CMI and AAC remains underexplored. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between CMI and AAC. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to explore the relationship between CMI and AAC. A weighted multivariate logistic regression model was employed to assess the associations between triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), CMI, and AAC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to assess the statistical association strength of each variable with AAC presence. Non-linear relationships were examined through restricted cubic spline (RCS) curve analysis. Potential influencing factors were investigated through subgroup analysis. Results: The average CMI of 2,675 participants was 0.98 ± 1.36. Multivariable regression showed that each one-unit increase in lnCMI was associated with a 0.19-point increase in the AAC score (β = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.03-0.35). Individuals in the highest CMI group had a 34% higher likelihood of severe AAC than those in the lowest (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66, Conclusion: This study demonstrated a positive correlation between CMI and AAC. However, given the cross-sectional nature of the study, causality cannot be directly inferred. These cross-sectional findings indicate a statistical association between CMI and AAC burden, suggesting potential epidemiological relevance. However, no causal inference can be drawn, but further longitudinal cohort studies are needed to confirm its potential value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.