ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Clinical validation of an integrated risk assessment test incorporating genomic and non-genomic data for sporadic breast cancer in Colombia.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of Polygenic Risk Stratification and Genomic Counseling in Colombia: An Embedded Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer risk arises from a complex interaction of genetic, environmental, and physiological factors. Integrating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) with clinical risk factors can enhance personalized risk prediction, especially in diverse populations like Colombia. Objective: To evaluate the predictive performance of ancestry-specific PRS combined with clinical and imaging risk factors for breast cancer in Colombian women. Methods: We developed and validated ancestry-specific PRS using diverse genetic datasets. A cohort of 1,997 Colombian women, including 510 breast cancer cases (25.5%) and 1,487 controls (74.5%), were recruited. Clinical data, such as breast density and family history, were analyzed for predictive ability using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Participants were categorized into genetic ancestry groups: Admixed American, African, and European. PRS were applied to the cohort and adjusted for clinical factors to assess risk prediction. Results: Breast density and family history were the strongest individual predictors, with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.64, respectively. Most participants were of Admixed American ancestry (70% of cases, 73% of controls). The combined PRS showed an Odds Ratio per Standard Deviation of 1.56 (95% CI 1.40-1.75) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74) when adjusted for family history. Incorporating PRS with clinical and imaging data improved the AUC to 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.81), significantly enhancing predictive accuracy. Conclusion: Combining ancestry-specific PRS with clinical risk factors provides a more accurate approach for breast cancer risk stratification in Colombian women. These findings support the development of precise, population-specific risk assessment models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.