Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672347›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Community Socioeconomic Disadvantage relates to White Matter Hyperintensity Burden in Mid-to-Late Life Adults.

Anna L Marsland, Minjie Wu, Mia K DeCataldo, Howard J Aizenstein, L Jinghang, Tamer S Ibrahim, Stephen B Manuck, Peter J Gianaros

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Minjie Wu
Mia K DeCataldo
Howard J Aizenstein
L Jinghang
Tamer S Ibrahim
Stephen B Manuck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residing in communities characterized by socioeconomic disadvantage may confer risk for neurodegenerative brain changes and future neuropathology. Based on prior evidence, this study tested the hypotheses that (1) community-level disadvantage would relate independently of individual-level socioeconomic position to white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), which reflect subclinical brain pathology that may presage later dementia; and (2) this association would be partly explained by blood pressure, cardiometabolic risk, and/or systemic levels of inflammation. These hypotheses were examined among otherwise healthy middle- and older-aged adults without clinical dementia at testing. Methods: Participants were 388 adults aged 40-72 years (53% female; 12% non-White) whose street addresses were entered into the Neighborhood Atlas to compute Area Deprivation Index scores by census block. Participants also underwent high resolution (7 Tesla) brain imaging to assess total WMH volume normalized for intracranial volume, and assessment of blood pressure, cardiometabolic (adiposity, lipids, glucose and insulin), and inflammatory (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) risk factors. Results: Linear regression models showed that higher community deprivation on the ADI associated with greater WMH volume, independently of age, sex, years of education and smoking. This association was largely independent of blood pressure, cardiometabolic risk and systemic inflammation. Conclusion: The present novel findings add to growing evidence that community disadvantage relates to preclinical neurodegenerative changes, which may contribute to accelerated brain and cognitive aging. Future work is warranted to better understand pathways that link residential environments to brain health and to identify targets for community and public policy interventions.

Identifiers

PMID40672347
PMCPMC12265620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.