ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Time-resolved functional connectivity during visuomotor graph learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans naturally attend to patterns that emerge in our perceptual environments, building mental models that allow future experiences to be processed more effectively and efficiently. Perceptual events and statistical relations can be represented as nodes and edges in a graph. Recent work in graph learning has shown that human behavior is sensitive to graph topology, but little is known about how that topology might elicit distinct neural responses during learning. Here, we address this knowledge gap by applying time-resolved network analyses to fMRI data collected during a visuomotor graph learning task. We assess neural signatures of learning on two types of structures: modular and non-modular lattice graphs. We find that task performance is supported by a highly flexible visual system, relatively stable brain-wide community structure, cohesiveness within the dorsal attention, limbic, default mode, and subcortical systems, and an increasing degree of integration between the visual and ventral attention systems. Additionally, we find that the time-resolved connectivity of the limbic, default mode, temporoparietal, and subcortical systems is associated with enhanced performance on modular graphs but not on lattice-like graphs. These findings provide evidence for the differential processing of statistical patterns with distinct underlying graph topologies. Our work highlights the similarities between the neural correlates of graph learning and those of statistical learning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.