ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Development and Characterization of a Tunable PDMS Substrate Model for Investigating Elastic Properties and Mechanical Stretching in Intervertebral Disc Cells.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Aberrant mechanical loading and altered extracellular matrix (ECM) composition favor catabolic cell responses, contributing to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and ultimately impairing the integrity of the annulus fibrosus (AF). This highlights the need for new Methods: Tunable PDMS substrates were fabricated by adjusting ratios of Sylgard 184 and Sylgard 527, enabling molding into stretching chambers or well plates. Substrates underwent mechanical, optical and chemical characterization. Bovine AF cells were seeded onto the substrates and cultured under static conditions or subjected to cyclic strain (8% strain at 1 Hz). Substrate biocompatibility and cell morphology were assessed over 72 h in static cultures. Dynamic responses were assessed by cell viability and alignment. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was employed to assess surface strain in custom-designed and commercial (STREX) stretching chambers at strains between 8 to 20%. Results: PDMS formulations resulted in a stiffness (E modulus) range of 8.72 - 238.00 kPa, demonstrating distinct viscoelastic profiles. All substrate formulations supported AF cell adhesion and viability. DIC analysis revealed non-uniform axial and transverse strain distributions on membrane surfaces. Cyclic stretching showed that cells maintained viability up to 14 h. Additionally, cells responded to the applied strain by perpendicular alignment to the stretch axis at 6 h. Conclusions: The PDMS based stretching platform offers a biocompatible and tunable mechanical environment that mimics physiological and pathophysiological elastic properties. It enables systematic investigations on how elastic properties and mechanical strain modulate AF cell behavior in IVD disease progression. Finally, this study raises the awareness of non-uniform and transverse strain components within the stretching chambers and highlights the discrepancy of effective strain transfer to the cell interaction surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.