ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Large-scale classification of metagenomic samples: a comparative analysis of classical machine learning techniques vs a novel brain-inspired hyperdimensional computing approach.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classical machine learning techniques have revolutionized bioinformatics, enabling researchers to extract knowledge from complex biological data. However, these techniques often struggle with high-dimensional data, where the increasing number of features leads to decreased performance, also affecting models accuracy. To address this problem, we explore hyperdimensional computing (HDC), an emerging brain-inspired computational paradigm that leverages high-dimensional vectors and simple arithmetic operations to represent and manipulate complex patterns, as an alternative approach in the context of supervised machine learning. In this work, we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of HDC against established machine learning techniques across a range of classification tasks. As a representative use case, we focus on classifying heterogeneous metagenomic samples based on their quantitative microbial profiles, using publicly available microbiome datasets. Our results demonstrate that HDC achieves comparable, and in some cases, superior classification accuracy to classical methods. Furthermore, our findings highlight the potential of HDC for improved computational efficiency, particularly when dealing with large-scale datasets, suggesting the HDC-based classifier as a promising tool for bioinformatics research, particularly in areas characterized by high-dimensional data. We also offer a Galaxy powered toolset to analyze your own datasets and generate reproducible workflows and adopt these methods in your own research with ease. Our investigation into the application of a HDC-based supervised machine learning technique for classifying microbial profiles in metagenomic samples yielded promising results, demonstrating the potential of this novel computational paradigm to complement and, in some cases, surpass the performances of well established machine learning techniques.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.