Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672125›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Acceptability of a Microbiome-Directed Food for the Management of Children with Uncomplicated Acute Malnutrition in Maradi, Niger: Two Randomized Crossover Trials.

Susan M Rattigan, Ibrahim Ngoumboute Mbouombouo, Mohamed Antar Abdou Tahirou, Ishita Mostafa, Kazi Nazmus Saqeeb, Souna Garba, Ousmane Guindo, Tahmeed Ahmed, Michael J Barratt, Jeffrey I Gordon and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05551819 (Acceptability of a Microbiome-directed Food for the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Acute Malnutrition in Niger), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05551819 nacompletednot on this map

Acceptability of a Microbiome-directed Food for the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Acute Malnutrition in Niger

TypeinterventionalSponsorEpicentreRan2022 to 2023Enrolled274ConditionsMalnutrition, ChildArmsMDF then RUTF/RUSF, RUTF/RUSF then MDF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Susan M RattiganDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Ibrahim Ngoumboute MbouombouoEpicentre, Niamey, Niger.
Mohamed Antar Abdou TahirouEpicentre, Niamey, Niger.
Ishita MostafaNutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kazi Nazmus SaqeebNutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Souna GarbaEpicentre, Niamey, Niger.
Ousmane GuindoEpicentre, Niamey, Niger.
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Michael J BarrattThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, The Newman Center for Gut Microbiome and Nutrition Research, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jeffrey I GordonThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, The Newman Center for Gut Microbiome and Nutrition Research, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Christopher R SudfeldDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Rebecca F GraisEpicentre, Paris, France.
Sheila IsanakaDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A novel ready-to-use microbiome-directed food (MDF) has been developed for the management of acute malnutrition using ingredients that promote repair of the gut microbiota of undernourished children. Objectives: This study aims to assess the acceptability of MDF compared with standard nutritional care among children with acute malnutrition. Methods: Two randomized crossover trials consisting of 2 14-d periods of at-home consumption were conducted. Children aged 6 to <24 mo with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) or moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) were individually randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the sequence of receiving MDF then standard nutritional care, or vice versa. Standard nutritional care consisted of ready-to-use therapeutic food for SAM and ready-to-use supplementary food for MAM. The primary outcome was at-home acceptability, defined as the return of ≥75% of sachets empty after the 14-d at-home consumption period. The primary analysis was a noninferiority analysis, in which MDF was considered noninferior if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in at-home acceptability comparing MDF with standard nutritional care was within -20 percentage points. Secondary outcomes included caregiver's perception of the child's liking, as well as caregiver willingness to use in the future and preference between the 2 foods. Results: In all, 128 children with SAM and 146 children with MAM were randomized. MDF was noninferior to standard nutritional care in terms of at-home acceptability among children with SAM (risk difference: -7.0; 95% CI lower bound: -11.6%) and among children with MAM (risk difference: -2.3%; 95% CI lower bound: -6.1%). There were no differences in caregiver willingness to use either food in future. Conclusions: MDF is acceptable for the management of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to <24 mo in Niger and should be further tested in other populations with a high prevalence of acute malnutrition. Effectiveness of the novel food will be assessed in forthcoming trials. Trial registration number: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05551819.

Indexed as

acceptabilityacute malnutritioncommunity-based management of acute malnutritionmicrobiome-directed foodNiger

Identifiers

PMID40672125
PMCPMC12266491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.